AI Compliance QuickScan

Complete your QuickScan

Answer the 10 questions below. Your EU AI Act readiness rating, compliance score, top gaps, and prioritized actions are generated immediately and a copy is emailed to you.

About your organization

Organization name *IndustryYour name *Work email *TitleEmployee count

We operate in, sell into, or serve users in the EU

Do you use AI in any of these high-risk areas?

Hiring / employment decisionsCredit or lending decisionsHealthcare or medical decisionsEducation access or scoringLaw enforcement / public safetyNone of these

1 of 10 · AI System Classification

Have you classified your AI systems against the EU AI Act risk tiers (prohibited, high-risk, limited-risk, minimal-risk)?

No — systems not classifiedAware of tiers, classification not startedClassification in progressAll systems classified and documented

2 of 10 · High-Risk System Controls

For any high-risk AI systems (hiring, credit, healthcare, law enforcement, education), do you have mandatory human oversight before action?

No high-risk AI identified / No human oversightSome oversight, inconsistently appliedOversight in place for most systemsMandatory oversight, documented, audited

3 of 10 · Technical Documentation

Do you maintain technical documentation for each AI system covering design, training data, validation, and limitations?

No documentationPartial documentationDocumentation for major systemsFull documentation, version controlled, audit-ready

4 of 10 · Data Governance

Are training datasets documented for quality, representativeness, and potential bias?

No dataset documentationBasic dataset records onlyQuality and provenance documentedFull dataset cards with bias analysis and representativeness metrics

5 of 10 · Transparency to Users

Are users informed when they are interacting with or subject to decisions made by AI?

No disclosureBuried in legal termsDisclosed at onboardingClear disclosure at point of interaction with explanation

6 of 10 · Right to Explanation

Can individuals subject to AI decisions request a meaningful explanation of how the decision was made?

No — not possibleTechnical explanation possible, not user-accessiblePlain-language explanation process existsAutomated explanation with appeal mechanism

7 of 10 · Conformity Assessment

For high-risk AI systems, have you conducted a conformity assessment (internal or third-party) against EU AI Act requirements?

No assessment conductedInternal review only, informalFormal internal assessmentThird-party conformity assessment with documentation

8 of 10 · Post-Market Monitoring

Do you monitor AI systems in production for performance degradation, bias drift, or unexpected behaviors?

No monitoringManual checks when issues reportedAutomated monitoring for some systemsContinuous monitoring with alerting and defined response playbooks

9 of 10 · Incident Reporting

Do you have a process to report serious AI incidents to regulators (required for high-risk AI under EU AI Act Article 73)?

No processGeneral incident process, not AI-specificAI-specific process draftedTested process with legal review and regulatory contact identified

10 of 10 · Governance Ownership

Is there a named individual or team responsible for EU AI Act compliance in your organization?

No owner identifiedInformally assigned to legal or ITFormal owner, part-time responsibilityDedicated AI compliance role with executive sponsorship

0/10 questions answered